Uhuru Escapes Dangerous Plan Plotted Against Him

Media reports suggest that former President Uhuru Kenyatta opted not to attend the Mt. Kenya youth peace meeting organized by Maina Njenga at Kabiruini Grounds in Nyeri.

Leaked information indicates that Kenyatta received intelligence from security agencies’ contacts about a government plan to infiltrate the gathering with Mungiki members. The goal was to portray him as reviving the outlawed gang and seeking authority in the Mount Kenya region.

Had Uhuru chosen to attend, the state might not have interfered directly. However, immediately after the meeting, 20 sessions with media outlets across 15 counties and 12 other meetings in the Mount Kenya region were planned to condemn what was framed as ‘Uhuru’s move to appoint Mungiki’ as the leader in the region.

According to credible intelligence sources cited by local newspaper Taifa Leo, this intricate plot was devised and launched in May 2023, involving leaders from the Mount Kenya region within the Kenyan First government, particularly those from the central region.

Recognizing the fear and disapproval of the Mungiki group in Mount Kenya, a counterplan aimed to implicate Uhuru, identified in intelligence reports from the National Intelligence Service (NIS) as one of the financiers of the Azimio protests against the government.

The orchestrated campaign sought to link Uhuru with the illegal Mungiki group. High-profile figures such as Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, Majority Leader Kimani Ichung’wa, and Kiharu MP Ndindi Nyoro publicly accused Uhuru of being a sponsor of Mungiki. Their claims gained support from other politicians in the Mount Kenya counties.

It is crucial to note that in various political and public meetings, the trio consistently declared that Uhuru was a sponsor of Mungiki, alleging that he intended to use the gang to create political turmoil in the Mount Kenya region.

The provided link directs to the detailed article on Taifa Leo, shedding light on the reported events and the intricate political dynamics at play.

This revelation brings to the forefront the complex interplay between political agendas, security concerns, and the delicate balance of power in the Mount Kenya region.

The allegations against Uhuru Kenyatta underscore the intensity of political rivalries and the strategies employed to shape public perception.

As this information surfaces, it raises questions about the credibility of such accusations and the potential implications for Uhuru’s political standing.

The intricacies of these political maneuvers suggest a deeply rooted competition for influence within the Mount Kenya region, with both sides employing strategic narratives to advance their objectives. The unfolding events will likely have repercussions on the political landscape and public opinion in Kenya.

Comments