Sankok argued that serving as President does not take away a person's right to express opinions on matters affecting the country.
He said former presidents still have a role to play in national discussions because of the experience they gained while leading the country.
Some political leaders have criticised Uhuru's public statements and political activities, arguing that he should allow the current administration to carry out its duties without interference.
However, Sankok believes that former presidents should be allowed to speak freely, just like other Kenyan citizens.
The EALA legislator also weighed in on the debate surrounding the retirement benefits of former presidents, particularly proposals by Nandi Senator Samson Cherargei to review some of the privileges enjoyed by retired Heads of State.
Sankok questioned the intention behind targeting the benefits of former presidents, arguing that such matters should be handled according to the Constitution rather than political interests.
He maintained that Uhuru deserves respect for having served the country as its fourth President.
The debate has sparked different reactions among Kenyans, with some supporting the former President's right to speak while others believe retired leaders should avoid getting involved in active politics.
Kenya's Constitution provides protection for the retirement benefits of former presidents, ensuring that such benefits cannot be reduced to their disadvantage during their lifetime.
Sankok's comments have added to the ongoing discussion about the place of former presidents in the country's political affairs.
He believes that retirement from State House should not mean losing one's voice on issues affecting ordinary Kenyans.
Source:https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1CZb2UfoY3/

Leave a Reply