Tag: Celebrity News

  • Erling Haaland makes first public comment on Man City 115 charges case

    Erling Haaland makes first public comment on Man City 115 charges case

    Erling Haaland makes first public comment on Man City 115 charges case

    After scoring a penalty in Norway's 3-1 victory over Wales in the UEFA Nations League, Erling Haaland commented publicly on Manchester City's 115-charge case for the first time.

    In September, the football world was rocked to its core when an independent commission found City guilty of their 114 charges. The 40-page verdict revealed that between 2009 and 2018 – a period when they clinched three Premier League titles – Man City had boosted their revenue to £900 million by arranging 'sham contracts' and relying on 'sham agreements' to artificially inflate the club's revenue and reduce its costs.

    City have maintained their innocence throughout the case, claiming they have 'irrefutable evidence' to prove it was the government of Abu Dhabi who own the sponsors and not the Cityzens owners, Abu Dhabi United Group (ADUG), topping up funds.

    The eight-time Premier League champions appealed the guilty verdict at the start of October, and sanctions – including possible points deductions, expulsion from the top flight, stripping of titles and fines – could be handed down by the start of next year.

    Throughout the biggest case in English football history, Enzo Maresca's men have been allowed to play games without any sanctions, and it's been business as usual for Erling Haaland.

    The Norwegian has scored 14 goals in as many matches for City in all competitions and, after netting for his country in a 3-1 win over Wales, he was finally asked about the guilty verdict publicly.

    "It didn’t start until 2009-2018, so… 2009, I think I played for Bryne FK (0:24) 2010, 2011,2012, 2013. Should we continue?" Haaland told TV 2 Sport in response when the reporter asked about the current "situation" at the Etihad Stadium.

    Then, after continuing to list the clubs he played for before joining Red Bull Salzburg from Molde in 2019, he affirmed: "So this is a question I struggle to answer. It’s a legal battle; I don’t know how to say it in Norwegian.

    "It’s a case between the Premier League and Manchester City, which will be brought up with a panel and such. Should I answer this? I don’t know. We had a lot of Norwegians in the club at that time. But it’s a bit of a difficult case to answer when I don’t really know that much," the 26-year-old continued.

    "I don’t know when the answer will be; I haven’t read much about it, to be honest. I’m focused on trying to perform for Manchester City, a club I signed a five-year contract with in 2022, and a nine-and-a-half-year contract with at the end of 2024.

    "So I think that’s really about it. I’m a City player, and I’m incredibly happy about that."

    Haaland's long-term future at the Etihad Stadium has been a huge topic of discussion across the past few months. It was revealed that the Norwegian goal machine doesn't have a relegation release clause inserted into the bumper nine-and-a-half-year contract – worth a reported £260 million – that he signed in January 2025.

    That means the club would instantly look to cash in on the striker if they are expelled from England's top flight, along with several other of their world-class players.

    When asked about his thoughts on City's future, Haaland replied: "As I said, I signed a long contract in 2024. I would say that in 2022 I made a relatively good choice to go to City. I can be honest and say that altogether.

    "When I look at the trophies I’ve won, the way I’ve developed, both on and off the pitch, I’m standing here just before a match after losing 3-1 with City in the Premier League.

    "But we have to try to turn that around on Saturday against Fulham. We can’t focus on that now, and we have to start focusing on Denmark."

    City's situation has alerted some of Europe's biggest clubs – including Barcelona – who are very interested in signing Haaland if their guilty verdict is upheld.

  • Man City’s appeal date in 115 charges case emerges

    Man City’s appeal date in 115 charges case emerges

    Man City's appeal date in 115 charges case emerges

    Manchester City's appeal date in their 115 charges case with the Premier League has emerged courtesy of a new report.

    In September, the Premier League announced that City were found guilty of 114 charges by an independent commission in a verdict that rocked football to its core.

    The 40-page verdict, stated that between 2009 and 2018, City arranged "sham contracts "and relied "on sham agreements to artificially inflate the club's revenues and reduce its costs" – boosting their revenues to £900 million.

    City have maintained their innocence throughout the process and stressed they have "irrefutable evidence" this set to be providing prove that it was the government of Abu Dhabi who own the sponsors and not the City owners Abu Dhabi United Group (ADUG) topping up funds.

    The eight-time Premier League champions have appealed the decision and Enzo Maresca's side being allowed to continue to play games without any sanctions has caused uproar amongst fans of other clubs.

    However, a new report from the Financial Times has provided the latest on the state of play. According to the report, sanctions will be handed down to early next year if City are unsuccessful in their appeal attempt.

    Citing people with knowledge on the situation, it's reported that the appeal is set to go ahead in mid-December and is expected to last for "a number of days".

    As per those close to the situation, another independent commission will be responsible for the verdict, which would be followed by punishment towards City should city lose their appeal.

    After the Premier League statement confirming City being found guilty, there have been demands for heavy sanctions to be imposed on City.

    Through the Premier League rule book, the independent commission would be able to decide on a punishment, which could include fines, a significant points deductions and even expulsion from the Premier League altogether.

    A record 50 points deduction has been touted by some media outlets as a possible sanction, surpassing the 30 points Luton Town were docked in the 2008/09 season.

    It is worth noting that punishments imposed will also have an appeal process and there could still be uncertainty with the legal battle dragging on beyond of this season, with no information on when penalties would come into play.

    The statement from the Premier League and the language used in the 40-page verdict was scathing, but City have appealed the outcome and continue to protest innocence.

    In a defiant video message statement, CEO Ferran Soriano said, "The whole Premier League case against us is based on a single false accusation; that the owner's personal money was somehow and secretly put into the club via some sponsors from Abu Dhabi."

    He then added that the club's lawyers "will now file an appeal that sets out the opinion contains clear, material errors of law, principle and fact and that it is unsafe".

    Journalist Mike Keegan reported that City's lawyers will argue that no rules were broken as sponsorship deals with government-funded companies have been extremely frequent in the Premier League and are legal.

    The claim that money was transferred to sponsors from government accounts, and then used by sponsors to pay City, was previously presented in the initial three-month hearing.

    However, the commission said this was "concocted well after the event in an attempt to obscure and conceal the realities of the disguised funding scheme".

    The use of the word "sham" to describe sponsorship contracts, as well as the length of time for an announcement and City having more witness, are also set to play a part in the appeal next month.